This is from Sandra John Yates
This is from Sandra John Yates
https://youtu.be/bWVgIAEha98
Their name liveth for evermore
Seven dead in Kabul airport crowds as UK backs later US deadline | Afghanistan | The Guardian
As the tragedy at Kabul airport unfolds each day, we would do well to remember how this whole catastrophe came about. In 2001, two men conspired with a few others, to bring about regime change in Afghanistan. Their cover story was to remove Al-Qaida from the country and to ensure that Afghanistan could not provide a sanctuary for "terrorists". However the real reason was and always has been to remove the Taliban from power and replace their regime with a regime more friendly to the west and particularly to the United States. Regime change is illegal under International Law as documented in the Nuremburg Principles. Those two conspirators were George Bush, then President of the United States and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair the then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. This brought about an illegal war based on lies and deceit, in the same way that Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi regime was removed from office later in 2003 today, George "Dubya" Bush, from his home in the Preston Hollow neighborhood of Dallas, Texas, watches as others attempt to resolve the chaos brought about in that wretched country and which has see the deaths of thousands of Afghani's and hundreds of service men and women, both American and British together with other NATO personnel.
![]() |
Kinnock, Blair, Mandelson, Campbell and Brown destroyed the labour party that is why I left then. When I renewed my membership I believed that Corbyn would restore socialist policies and work for the benefit of the membership and the people. We almost did it but were stabbed in the back by elements of the duplicitous PLP and traitorous employees in the party organisation. I am no longer a member of the party, but it is clear to see that some are pleased with a return to the good old days, as Starmer carry's on the destruction started by Blair et al. To those who choose to remain in the party and resist, I would mention that Starmer is even more of a Stalinist than was Blair, (If that is possible), and with the aid of his sycophant followers will crush any opposition to his Blair Mk. 2 party. The Labour party of Keir Hardy, Clem Attlee and Nye Bevan is dead and will not return. The Labour government of 1945 should have been the beginning of a socialist nation, but tragically for the country and its people, it was the end
Funerals held in Gaza as Israel renews air raids: Live news | Al-Aqsa Mosque News | Al Jazeera
Hartlepool by election result May 6th 2021.
Conservative win with 15529 votes 51.9%.
Labour second with 8589 votes 28.7%
At the 2019 General election, the Labour party won with 37.7% with the Conservative candidate taking 28.9% of the vote.
Which ever way you look at it, this result was nothing short of a catastrophe for the Labour party, and yet only 2 days after the election which Labour lost for the first time in the Constituency's history, Keir Starmer is trotting out the usual clichés repeated by numerous Labour MP's since then and again with Alex Norris MP adding his cliché ridden response on television this morning. "We must reconnect with our traditional base", "We are not getting the message across", "we have a mountain to climb", etc etc The cant and hypocrisy rolls out thick and fast as Labour try to find some justification for the electoral humiliation of May 6th with scant success. They cannot now blame Jeremy Corbyn for this rout (though some are trying to do so even now) nor can they blame the Brexit fiasco which even now some are deeply regretting.
The real cause of this Labour meltdown in its traditional heartland is the performance of Keir Starmer and his obsequious followers, the Stalinist regime now installed within the Labour party hierarchy and machinery and not least of all, by the drive to return to the "good old days" of trying to be all things to all men. The defeat was brought about by the conspiracy within the PLP with their supporters in the media and certain members within the Labour party management structure at Party headquarters determined to prevent Jeremy Corbyn from becoming Prime Minister at any cost in the 2019 general election. Assisted in this was the unrelenting smear campaign instigated by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Friends of Israel Lobbies, the Labour First clique and the IHRA definition of antisemitism and other Jewish lobbies, to ensure that Corbyn was removed from the position of Labour leader and a more acceptable person was installed in the post. This appeasement has resulted in the Lobbies and the PLP installing the leader that they wanted and the resultant drift towards "centralist" labour policies more associated with Blair, Brown, Campbell and Mandelson, which did not then nor do they now, bear any relationship to the desires and aspirations of working people and their families. The Brexit diversion has now gone, and Labour should look towards their true values rather that the values dictated by others.
Starmer and those who blindly follow him have only themselves to blame. Labour has been haemorrhaging members by the thousand each day since Starmer was elected. The Labour voter base in the so called "Red Wall" has collapsed as it has all over this country. The traditional Labour voters as well as those new voters entering the political arena desire new radical policies which address todays problems and issues. They do not want nor do they deserve a Labour party offering "Tory lite" policies addressing yesterdays values and outlook.
In this the Labour party is failing miserably in this task and are failing the people of this country. It has become in a very short time an irrelevant and obsolete faction, important only to a few people who speak to or for themselves, while the country cries out for leadership and opposition the Johnson and his gangsters in number 10.
The Labour party as I knew it and for which I worked for many year has finally succumbed to self interest and insignificance.
R I P
A victory for the sub postmasters who have been wrongly convicted in the greatest miscarriage of justice ever seen in this country. The Appeal Court in its judgement in favour of the sub postmasters found that “Throughout the period covered by these prosecutions Post Office Limited’s (POL’s) approach to investigation and disclosure was influenced by what was in the interests of POL, rather than by what the law required" adding that the convictions were “an affront to the conscience of the court.” The distress and financial hardships, and even prison sentences for some, had left innocent people with a criminal record, severe emotional trauma, the loss of their home and bankruptcies in a number of cases.
The cause of this travesty of justice was the introduction by the Post Office of a new computer system named Horizon, developed by the Japanese company Fujitsu, to be used in sub post offices for a variety of tasks including accounting and stocktaking. Almost from the start, it was evident that the system had significant problems These problems caused the system to misreport transactions leading to money, sometimes large amounts, going "missing" from the sub postmasters accounts. The sub postmasters were unable to challenge the errors because they were unable to access information about the Horizon software. Consequently more than 900 prosecutions theft, fraud and false accounting were made against the sub postmasters. Following the convictions, some went to prison, were shunned by their communities and struggled to secure work. Some lost their homes, and even failed to get insurance owing to their convictions. Some have since died. The postmasters have always maintained that the computer system was at fault and that they were not responsible for any wrong doing.
Throughout this mockery, the Post Office and Fujitsu, maintained that there was nothing wrong with the Horizon system and that all the "missing money" was the result of criminal activity by postmasters. It is now appears that a conspiracy existed between the Post office and Fujitsu as the DPP are considering whether there should be charges of perjury against officials who claimed in court there were no problems with Horizon, even though emails and other documents now suggest they knew that there were.
It really is completely unacceptable that the Post office should consider that an apology would compensate for the years of trauma, loss of homes, criminal convictions and years spent in prison. The Post office statement that "We sincerely apologise to the postmasters affected by our historical failures" adding "Throughout this appeals process we have supported the quashing of the overwhelming majority of these convictions and the judgment will be an important milestone in addressing the past."
There can be no question as to whether those responsible for this cover up should escape prosecution. In the same way that there must be no question as to compensation for the postmaster. However, no level of compensations can ever be enough to replace that which the postmasters have lost in reputation, livelihoods, financial loss and time in prison. It is even more tragic when we consider that some have died without knowing that their reputations and actions have been vindicated.
The actions of the Post Office and Fujitsu have been reprehensible throughout this travesty and they must be held accountable in law and in equity.
A petition is currently circulating on social media from Liberal Council Andy Canning, calling for Dorset Council to use South Walks House, and other Dorset Council buildings that are currently surplus to requirements, to provide 100% affordable and social housing.
I have not signed this petition.
Historically, Conservative Councils and Conservative governments have been opposed to social housing in any form. A comparison between the housing stock, maintenance facilities and new build shows a significant variation in the allocation of resources and actual performance. This imbalance between Conservative led councils and others including "NOC" councils goes back over many years.
Some time ago, when I was a member of the Basingstoke Borough Council, my group put down a motion critical of the Conservatives policy on council house provision, the growing number of families in the Borough waiting list in the Borough for council housing and demanding that the council take immediate action to substantially reduce the numbers on the waiting list. During the course of a heated debate, the ruling group's attitude towards council house tenants and those still on the waiting list for a home, was glaringly obvious as various members contributed to the arguments. Eventually the Conservative group (there was no overall control at that time) defeated our motion with the support of the Liberal group and some abstentions from "Independent" members.
The most atrocious and offensive contribution to the debate was when a Conservative member got to her feet and stated that there was in fact no waiting list problem. She went on to say that it was just a matter of time before the list was reduced in any case. Her reasoning for this ridiculous assertion was that natural selection would provide that as disabled people moved out of houses and that as older people passed on, a stock of houses would become available for those on the waiting list to move in. The benches in the chamber, particularly from my group erupted with howls of derision, shock and anger and at this heinous comment from an elected member of the council.
This incident has remained with me as a graphic reminder of the callous and soulless reminder that no matter what lip service Conservative's may pay to the plight of homeless or people waiting for social housing, the bottom line is that they are indifferent to the problem. In this, from that day when the Liberals supported the conservatives and from subsequent experience, I also have little sympathy for Liberals who invariably express concern but support policies which are no better than conservatives.
Hundreds of British Gas workers have been sacked in the latest "Fire and Rehire "dispute, where employees are forced to accept new contracts with longer hours and reduced pay. The alternative to signing the new contracts of employment is to be dismissed by the employer who is then able to recruit a new workforce on the poorer conditions. This is an deplorable tactic which of course is condoned by the government who at the same time mutter weasel words of criticism of the company's action but do nothing to remove this abusive practice by employers using this stratagem.
British Gas however compound this assault on working people by issuing a patronising statement to justify their action as if seeking some sympathy for sackings.
British Gas:
“While change is difficult, reversing our decline which has seen us lose over three million customers, cut over 15,000 jobs and seen profits halved over the last 10 years is necessary.”
The last part of this British Gas Statement says it all. As with most disputes, this one is all about the company, in this case Centrica, seeking to maintain or preferably increase profits, and it is always at the expense of its workers. Throughout the history of working practices, and particularly since the Industrial Revolution. the struggle between the workers and the employers has predominately revolved around pay and conditions. With the Repeal of the Combination Act, it became possible for workers to organise and become members of an appropriate Union. Since then, many unscrupulous employers aided and abetted by successive conservative governments, have sought new ways to ensure that the employee remains in a subservient position and should be "grateful" to have a job.
This current dispute is only one of the disputes involving companies who have profited from government support during the Covid crisis. Recent reports suggest that 9 of the 13 private employers threatening to dismiss and re-engage staff on worse contracts have managed to maintain healthy profit margins, with some even increasing executive pay. British Gas reported profits of £80 million in its last update and Centrica, the parent company of British Gas received £27million under the governments "Job Retention Scheme".
This atrocious policy must be attacked and opposed by the Trade Union movement as a whole and the Labour party in particular exposing this as yet another example of iniquitous behaviour by employers. With particular reference to the Labour Party, they must loudly declare that this Fire and Rehire practice will be banned under legislation to stop the abuse, by any future Labour government.
The extent to which the influence of the Friends of Israel and other Jewish lobbies have become dominant in British political life or in society is both shocking and alarming. This time it is none other than Bozo Boris himself who is leaning over backwards to appease the Conservative Friends of Israel, with his assurance that his "government opposed this particular inquiry into Israel" adding that “This investigation gives the impression of being a partial and prejudicial attack on a friend and ally of the UK’s,” He was of course referring to the International Criminal Court investigation into alleged war crimes in the Israeli-occupied territories. His pathetic reasoning for this stance is that “Israel is not a party to the statute of Rome [that established the court] and Palestine is not a sovereign state”. In addition, he endorses Benjamin Netanyahu's statement, no doubt agreed by the Americans, that Israel rejected the case as “undiluted antisemitism and the height of hypocrisy”.
With the United States, the United Kingdom and of course Israel. the investigation is unlikely to take place, but even if it does, any findings will be totally ignored on both sides of the Atlantic. In the face of all the evidence of Israeli war crimes in Gaza, the West Bank and thought-out the Occupied territories The British Government follows the dogma of appeasement to Israel regardless of circumstances,
Why is it that the collective guilty conscience surrounding the Holocaust remains so prevalent in the western world and in fact seems to be growing stronger as time passes?
We have seen how the activities of these lobbies has in recent years influenced the structure of political parties, the foreign policies of nations and not least of all the way in which legislation has been enacted in this country to effectively ban any criticism of Israel and to criminalise anyone deemed to be acting or speaking in any way which can be labelled as antiemetic, no matter how tenuous a link may be.
It is a frightening fact that Israel and those who support Israel, can do nothing wrong and we have given them carte blanche to carry on with the obscene policies towards Palestinians and others, as decreed in Tel Aviv. This acquiescence will return to haunt us all in the future
This is from Sandra John Yates I ordered flowers on line from Marks and Spencer to be delivered on Dec. 23rd. they were to be taken to the...